Boeing have won new orders for their 777 from Taiwan’s China Airlines.
Read more here:
Showing posts with label Taiwan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Taiwan. Show all posts
Saturday, 22 December 2012
Monday, 15 February 2010
The Miracle on the Han River
After the stalemate of the Korean War South Korea was a developing nation. It was on a par with the British Gold Coast (Ghana) and Malaya (which became Malaysia and Singapore).
However, something truly remarkable happened in South Korea. It has been called the Miracle on the Han River (the Han River runs through Seoul, South Korea's captial city) and has been used as a template for economic growth and development for a developing nation.
Seoul was a typical developing city. High unemployment and high poverty. However the US Government, determined to keep the South out of the hand of the Communist North, followed the template of the rebuilding of both Germany and Japan.
Rapid industrialisation began in the late 1950s and the aim was to become a massive exporter to the Western markets of goods such as electronics, ship building, textiles, cars, and steel.
Influenced by Reaganomics, the South Koreans also kept inflation low by reducing the money supply, but also embarked on many public works to rebuild infrastructure such as transport links and communication links.
A major announcement to the World that South Korea was a major player in the global economy was the succesfull 1988 Summer Olympics held in Seoul.
South Korea is often cited as an imitator of Japan, but with the US influence and the gradual move away from a Government controlled market to one that reflects consumer needs, the comparison is actually a natural one.
The benefits to the average South Korean has resulted in an incredible rise in the standard of living, and superior education to what was available in comparitor nations of the 1950s.
The Tiger Economies of Asia have attempted to copy South Korea and many have grown their own economies but none have had the impact on the ordinary people as the South Koreans have.
Malaysia has the aim of being developed by 2020, and the influence of South Korea is apparent. A move away from agriculture to manufacturing, and the building of public projects such as the KL monorail and the KLIA (Kuala Lumpur International Airport) in addition to hosting an Formula 1 race and the 1998 Commonwealth Games.
But as we have seen with India, the problem is that if a nation moves too quickly to the services sector they run the risk of having nothing unique. The same could be said of manufacturing, but as we all are aware, South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan have built their economies on cheap but good quality goods, relying on cheap labour, but also excellent quality control and standardisation where possible.
Singapore and Hong Kong are different in that they have built their prosperity on being financial hubs. But again they are relatively small city-states (well Hong Kong does have a unique status in China!) compared to the behemoths of India and China.
I think the Miracle of the Han River may be replicated in other nations but they do rely on the backing of a major importer like the United States and they need to create global brands that will attract consumers.
But there is no doubt that the 21st Century will belong to Asia and the Pacific.
However, something truly remarkable happened in South Korea. It has been called the Miracle on the Han River (the Han River runs through Seoul, South Korea's captial city) and has been used as a template for economic growth and development for a developing nation.
Seoul was a typical developing city. High unemployment and high poverty. However the US Government, determined to keep the South out of the hand of the Communist North, followed the template of the rebuilding of both Germany and Japan.
Rapid industrialisation began in the late 1950s and the aim was to become a massive exporter to the Western markets of goods such as electronics, ship building, textiles, cars, and steel.
Influenced by Reaganomics, the South Koreans also kept inflation low by reducing the money supply, but also embarked on many public works to rebuild infrastructure such as transport links and communication links.
A major announcement to the World that South Korea was a major player in the global economy was the succesfull 1988 Summer Olympics held in Seoul.
South Korea is often cited as an imitator of Japan, but with the US influence and the gradual move away from a Government controlled market to one that reflects consumer needs, the comparison is actually a natural one.
The benefits to the average South Korean has resulted in an incredible rise in the standard of living, and superior education to what was available in comparitor nations of the 1950s.
The Tiger Economies of Asia have attempted to copy South Korea and many have grown their own economies but none have had the impact on the ordinary people as the South Koreans have.
Malaysia has the aim of being developed by 2020, and the influence of South Korea is apparent. A move away from agriculture to manufacturing, and the building of public projects such as the KL monorail and the KLIA (Kuala Lumpur International Airport) in addition to hosting an Formula 1 race and the 1998 Commonwealth Games.
But as we have seen with India, the problem is that if a nation moves too quickly to the services sector they run the risk of having nothing unique. The same could be said of manufacturing, but as we all are aware, South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan have built their economies on cheap but good quality goods, relying on cheap labour, but also excellent quality control and standardisation where possible.
Singapore and Hong Kong are different in that they have built their prosperity on being financial hubs. But again they are relatively small city-states (well Hong Kong does have a unique status in China!) compared to the behemoths of India and China.
I think the Miracle of the Han River may be replicated in other nations but they do rely on the backing of a major importer like the United States and they need to create global brands that will attract consumers.
But there is no doubt that the 21st Century will belong to Asia and the Pacific.
Friday, 25 September 2009
Asian Tiger Economies
The boom in Asian markets over the last 15 years or so is hopefully an inspiration for the economies of Africa and Latin America.
India is also beginning to take off in quite dramatic fashion, following to some extent the rapid boom in China.
However, historically the 'Tiger' Economies refers to Hong Kong, South Korea, Taiwan, Malaysia, and Singapore.
Hong Kong was the model that has been duplicated by the rest. It is interesting to note that in Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia, Britain governed them before independence. The trade links and contacts utilised by the UK is probably the main reason for this and not some old Imperialist propaganda! It is also important to recognise the large Chinese populations in these nations or the influence China has had on their indigenous culture.
The reasons for the growth of these nations have been many. It is often reckoned that:
They have specialised in either Financial Investment or Information Technology.
South Korea is the world's largest shipbuilder and from the ashes of the Korean War they have created global multinationals such as Samsung, Hyundai and Daewoo, all permanent rivals of their more illustrious Japanese counterparts.
What are the future implications for the EU? Or for the USA? Or even Japan, who for so long has been the Asian economic superpower, but after the 90s and deflation, Japan may find it hard to regain its omnipotence.
These traditional Asian Tigers along with the likes of Thailand, rely heavily on exports. With the world currently in recession, fewer goods are being shipped abroad to the Western consumers who buy these goods due to their technical brilliance, and more often than not, their low price.
Many of the Tigers relied on Tourism also, but again more and more people are staying at home (incidentally, this factor is reported as having boosted our own Halfords company in the UK as more people bought camping equipment and bikes rather than jetsetting off across the globe), but where does it leave the Tiger economies?
It will be fascinating to watch African and Latin American nations who do not have vast natural resources trying to emulate the Asian Tigers. Whereas the other developing nations who do have vast natural resources may opt for the route that the likes of Dubai are going down by using their current wealth to prepare for the days when the oil runs out.
If we are to summarise the emergence of the Tigers it really is down to their committment to low cost and good quality.
India is also beginning to take off in quite dramatic fashion, following to some extent the rapid boom in China.
However, historically the 'Tiger' Economies refers to Hong Kong, South Korea, Taiwan, Malaysia, and Singapore.
Hong Kong was the model that has been duplicated by the rest. It is interesting to note that in Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia, Britain governed them before independence. The trade links and contacts utilised by the UK is probably the main reason for this and not some old Imperialist propaganda! It is also important to recognise the large Chinese populations in these nations or the influence China has had on their indigenous culture.
The reasons for the growth of these nations have been many. It is often reckoned that:
- low Government spending has also encouraged high investment from overseas
- an emphasis on creating skilled workers in place of a reliance on natural resources
- excellent labour relations between employees and owners
- having a 'can-do' philosophy
- focusing on emerging markets and technologies
- adopting Japanese Production Methods
They have specialised in either Financial Investment or Information Technology.
South Korea is the world's largest shipbuilder and from the ashes of the Korean War they have created global multinationals such as Samsung, Hyundai and Daewoo, all permanent rivals of their more illustrious Japanese counterparts.
What are the future implications for the EU? Or for the USA? Or even Japan, who for so long has been the Asian economic superpower, but after the 90s and deflation, Japan may find it hard to regain its omnipotence.
These traditional Asian Tigers along with the likes of Thailand, rely heavily on exports. With the world currently in recession, fewer goods are being shipped abroad to the Western consumers who buy these goods due to their technical brilliance, and more often than not, their low price.
Many of the Tigers relied on Tourism also, but again more and more people are staying at home (incidentally, this factor is reported as having boosted our own Halfords company in the UK as more people bought camping equipment and bikes rather than jetsetting off across the globe), but where does it leave the Tiger economies?
It will be fascinating to watch African and Latin American nations who do not have vast natural resources trying to emulate the Asian Tigers. Whereas the other developing nations who do have vast natural resources may opt for the route that the likes of Dubai are going down by using their current wealth to prepare for the days when the oil runs out.
If we are to summarise the emergence of the Tigers it really is down to their committment to low cost and good quality.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
